13 May 2015
HKSAR v. YEUNG KA SING, CARSON
- Citation
- HKSAR v. YEUNG KA SING, CARSON
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC101/2014
Although the five charges were duplicitous because they aggregated many distinct deposits over lengthy periods, the defence suffered no prejudice because the prosecution particularised the incidents in expert reports and the defence addressed each tranche separately; the trial judge considered the accused’s evidence and surrounding circumstances (cash patterns, SJM cheques, Gold Wo transactions, unexplained transfers from father's accounts) and had an evidential basis to conclude a right‑thinking person would have reasonable grounds to believe the monies were proceeds of indictable offences;…