18 Nov 1993
R. v. CHAN KEIN WING and Another
- Citation
- R. v. CHAN KEIN WING and Another
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC33/1993
Article 12(1) must be applied by examining the proven facts; the first appellant's conduct established intent to pass under s100(1) so he cannot benefit from the lighter penalty, whereas the second appellant's participation did not cogently establish specific intent and thus he is entitled to the lighter penalty under s100(2), warranting reduction of his sentence from four to two years.