8 Nov 2003
HKSAR v. CHAU CHEUK YIN
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHAU CHEUK YIN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA641/2003
The Magistrate, as primary fact-finder, accepted the complainant's evidence and rejected the Appellant's; on findings that the Appellant followed the complainant, positioned himself behind her and held a camera-phone under her skirt for an appreciable time, his presence constituted loitering with a non-innocent purpose and caused reasonable concern, therefore the conviction under s.160(3) was legally sustainable and the appeal on conviction fails.