29 Aug 1996
R. v. LEE PUN LING
- Citation
- R. v. LEE PUN LING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA456/1996
The Magistrate was entitled to find the appellant dishonest on the evidence despite PW5's suggestion RTI might have accepted the conduct; the appellant's silence left no competing explanation, so conviction was safe; however, appellate interference on sentence was justified given mitigating factors including employer laxity and personal consequences, resulting in suspension of the three-month term for one year.