2 Aug 1985
THE QUEEN v. LI YUN WING AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. LI YUN WING AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC547/1984
Convictions under s4(2)(a) could not be sustained because the charges alleged abstention 'in respect of alleged offences' (denoting pre-existing offences) whereas the evidence only showed payments for future protection; applying Attorney General v IP Chiu, the misframing of charges and the insufficiency of evidence to connect payments to existing alleged offences required quashing of those convictions.