22 Feb 2012
GREAT HARVEST PROPERTY INVESTMENT LTD v. HO FREEMAN CHI MAN AND OTHERS
- Citation
- GREAT HARVEST PROPERTY INVESTMENT LTD v. HO FREEMAN CHI MAN AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA560/2010
Leave to re-amend was refused because the proposed re-amendments alleged that the Company had discharged the purchasers and relied on Ho's promise to pay, which was directly inconsistent with the Company's continuing claim against the purchasers for the same deposits; the Company failed to show reasonable grounds for inconsistent alternative pleadings under Order 18 r12A and failed to verify by its own officers; further, the Company is not the holder of the cheques and had not pleaded any assignment/endorsement or other title to sue on the cheques, so the claim against the 1st defendant based…