21 May 2018
HEROSTAR PROPERTIES LTDDI AND OTHERS v. CHEUNG YU PING AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 1112
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2236/2014
The amendment was allowed because, on the available evidence, the plaintiffs had reasonable grounds to plead alternative inconsistent facts (forgery or signing in blank/under misrepresentation) and those alternatives were plausible; the plea was not so inherently unbelievable as to merit refusal under Order 18 rule 12A or to be struck out under the strike‑out test applied to amendments.