5 Dec 2000
WELTIME HONG KONG LTD. v. KEN FORWARD ENGINEERING LTD.
- Citation
- WELTIME HONG KONG LTD. v. KEN FORWARD ENGINEERING LTD.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT73/2000
The court refused leave because the plaintiffs failed to show that both arbitrators were plainly wrong; the arbitrators' conclusion that clause 35 required a joint appointment and was technically inoperable after dissolution of RICS(HK Branch) was tenable, and application to HKIAC under s.12 was proper to give effect to the parties' agreement to arbitrate; consequently the arbitrators had jurisdiction and the plaintiffs' summons was dismissed with costs.