19 Sept 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 聶明麗
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 3324
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA370/2023
Although the trial judge misstated the s.26AAB evidential standard, the court on re-hearing found the totality of evidence — expert reports showing visibly poor workmanship on many shoes, appellant's control of premises and keys, signing of delivery documents, receipt of payments, and involvement in packing/dispatch — established beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant knew of or had reasonable grounds to suspect the goods bore counterfeit trademarks and was in possession of the exhibits; appeal dismissed and convictions upheld.