4 Jul 2019
香港特別行政區 訴 何田方
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 1508
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA414/2018
The court upheld the trial judge's acceptance of the complainant's evidence on the first and third incidents and refused to disturb those factual findings; however, because the complainant could not identify what contacted her thigh on the second day and the description was consistent with non‑identifiable contact, the conviction on the second count was unsafe and was quashed.