10 Sept 2004
LEIGHTON CONTRACTORS (ASIA) LTD v. STELUX HOLDINGS LTD
- Citation
- LEIGHTON CONTRACTORS (ASIA) LTD v. STELUX HOLDINGS LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT29/2004
Leave to appeal is refused because the Arbitrator was not shown to be obviously or seriously wrong: clause 23 is to be applied by reference to the state of the works at the time information was required so a causal link to likely delay must be shown; on the Arbitrator's findings the late information could not have caused delay; the Arbitrator was entitled to prefer one expert's time-slice analysis over another and did not commit technical misconduct by declining further submissions.