29 Mar 2023
Extension refused because the decision was sent to the applicant's last known address and not returned (giving rise to inference of receipt), the applicant failed to provide any reasonable explanation for the delay, and the intended appeal was hopeless because no arguable error of law, procedural unfairness or Wednesbury unreasonableness in the Board's or Judge's decisions was identified.
19 Jan 2006
The Court held that the Tribunal's findings that price sensitive information existed and that the appellants' conduct (telephone records, trading anomalies, payments and failure to give credible explanations) supported inferences of tipping and insider dealing were sustainable and not open to disturbance on appeal; accordingly Sonny Chan's appeal was struck out as an appeal on fact, while limited leave to appeal was granted to Koon only on specified factual grounds (paragraphs 8,10,11,12 and 13 of his grounds).
21 Feb 1995
The Presiding Officer did not err: he considered redundancy and found the employer's evidence untrustworthy; therefore the employer failed to rebut the s.31Q presumption that dismissal was by reason of redundancy, entitling the employee to severance payment; appeal dismissed.