8 May 1987
ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TONG KAI MAN
- Citation
- ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TONG KAI MAN
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CAAR7/1987
The Court held that the assault, criminal intimidation and the perverting the course of justice offences were distinct from the money‑lending offences and therefore should not have been wholly concurrent; it varied the concurrency directions so that certain sentences run consecutively, leaving individual term lengths undisturbed, producing an aggregate of 36 months which was then reduced to 30 months to reflect the review discount.