Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Royal Court dismissed the plaintiff’s summons for a fresh review of Tranche 1 personal data, wider mobile searches and a DAT load file, but ordered affidavits on irrelevancy, quality control and complete production.
RA v Chief Minister of Jersey and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Binnington : Costs) [2026] JRC 001 (5 January 2026)
The Royal Court awarded the plaintiff standard-basis costs for both an appeal and the hearing below, refusing indemnity costs because the defendants’ conduct was not exceptional.
Abramovich v Chief Minister of Jersey and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Cadin) [2025] JRC 308 (21 November 2025)
The Royal Court granted summary judgment on the GOJ Defendants’ failure to meet DSAR time limits under the Data Protection (Jersey) Law, but left damages for trial.
The Royal Court ordered the Government of Jersey defendants to pay Abramovich’s costs on an indemnity basis for two hearings, citing unreasonable litigation conduct.
Alwitry -v- The States Employment Board and Minister for H&SS [2016] JRC 050 (25 February 2016)
The Royal Court of Jersey partly granted a subject access application, requiring disclosure of category 2 and category 3 data, with limited redactions for third-party privacy.
Alwitry v. States Employment Bd. [2016] 1 JLR 172 (25 February 2016)
The applicant was entitled to disclosure of relevant employment information, including interview materials, with only unrelated personal data subject to redaction.
Alwitry -v- States Employment Board and Minister for H&SS [2015] JRC 131 (17 June 2015)
The Royal Court of Jersey ordered limited production of undisclosed personal data to the court under Article 15 of the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2005.
Alwitry v. States Employment Bd. [2015] 1 JLR_Note 32 (17 June 2015)
The court held it could inspect data in deciding a subject access request dispute under data protection law, and judgment was entered for the applicant.
In the matter of Lucy (Care proceedings) [2014] JRC 212 (05 November 2014)
The Royal Court refused leave to disclose care-proceedings documents for a Serious Case Review, finding the child’s private interests and risks from publication outweighed the public interest.
Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police -v- The Panel of Jurats [2014] JRC 114B (21 May 2014)
The Royal Court dismissed a judicial review challenge to a police discipline appeal decision, upholding a reduced sanction for PC X and refusing publication of the private appeal reasons.
Explore more
