Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Crook and Renouf v Greffier of the States [2004] JRC 212 (06 December 2004)
The Jersey Royal Court held the claimants had an arguable case on compulsory purchase valuation and directed the arbitrators to state a case, while staying proceedings for mediation.
P. E. C. v Lesquende Ltd. [2003] JLR 485 (19 September 2003)
The case considers compulsory purchase compensation under the Pointe Gourde principle and holds that “scheme” is broad enough to include related re-zoning if factually linked.
P and E v Lesquende Ltd [2003] JRC 167 (19 September 2003)
The Royal Court held that the Board misdirected itself on whether rezoning could form part of the compulsory purchase scheme under the Point Gourde principle.
P. E. C. v Lesquende Ltd. [2003] JLR 405 (16 July 2003)
Jersey planning and compulsory purchase appeal on whether statutory prohibition on appeal applied before a case was stated and determined by the court.
P. E. C. v Lesquende Ltd. [2003] JLR_Note 8 (30 January 2003)
A Jersey planning law note concerning a compulsory purchase dispute, addressing how the price should be settled by arbitration in a case stated.
Planning and Environment v Lesquende [2003] JCA 021 (30 January 2003)
The Court of Appeal of Jersey refused leave to appeal against a refusal to order a case stated in a compulsory purchase compensation dispute, holding the issue was factual.
P. E. C. v Lesquende Ltd. [2003] JLR 15 (10 January 2003)
The court held there was no appeal from the Royal Court’s refusal to order a case stated under the 1961 compulsory purchase law, because article 12(2) makes the decision final.
P. E. C. v Lesquende Ltd. [2002] JLR 492 (15 October 2002)
In a compulsory purchase arbitration, the court held it would interfere only on a point of law and that unreasonableness is a factual conclusion, not enough on its own.
P and E v Lesquende [2002] JRC 196 (15 October 2002)
The Royal Court granted a case-stated order on one valuation issue in Lesquende, holding there was an arguable error of law about whether rezoning formed part of the scheme.
1999/29 - Planning v Lesquende [1999] UR 29 (9 February 1999)
The Royal Court refused Lesquende Limited’s application for a stay of execution pending appeal against summary judgment requiring restitution of a quashed award.
Explore more
