Barno v Republic
Barno v Republic [2025] KEHC 8257 (KLR)
The High Court held that the trial court exercised its sentencing discretion appropriately and that there was no error of fact or law, nor any exceptional or compelling circumstances, to warrant interference with the sentence. The applicant's status as a first offender and his plea for leniency were considered, but the sentence was found to be proportionate to the offence. The application for sentence review was therefore dismissed under section 382 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Source excerpt
- Sentence Review
- Appellate Discretion
- Handling Stolen Goods