Sign in
Malawi Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Malawi Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

Malawi decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Tort law [2024] MWHC 26

Kaliya v Times Television Limited

Kaliya v Times Television Limited (Civil Cause 153 of 2015) [2024] MWHC 26 (19 April 2024)

The court found that the defendant published defamatory statements about the claimant despite police requests to delay, causing reputational harm. However, the claimant failed to prove pecuniary loss or entitlement to exemplary damages. The court awarded compensatory damages only, considering comparable awards, the erosion of the Malawi Kwacha, and the need to balance compensation with media freedom.

  • Defamation
  • Damages
  • Exemplary damages
  • Compensatory damages
  • Freedom of expression
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2024] MWSC 9

Libertas General Insurance Company Limited v Puffs (MSCA Miscellaneous Civil Application 62 of 2023)

Libertas General Insurance Company Limited v Puffs (MSCA Miscellaneous Civil Application 62 of 2023) [2024] MWSC 9 (10 April 2024)

The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed a preliminary objection and refused a stay of execution pending appeal because the objection was procedurally defective and the lower court judgment was inchoate.

  • Stay of execution
  • Preliminary objection
  • Inchoate judgment
  • Appealability
  • Stay-of-execution
  • Preliminary-objection
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] MWHC 19

Batatawala and Another v Director of Anti Corruption Bureau and Another

Batatawala and Another v Director of Anti Corruption Bureau and Another (Constitutional Cause 1 of 2023) [2024] MWHC 19 (10 April 2024)

The charging of the Claimants under the FCA for acts committed before its commencement amounts to retrospective application, but this falls under the exception to the general rule because the offence of money laundering under the FCA is substantially the same as under the repealed law. There is no violation of section 42(2)(f)(vi) of the Constitution because money laundering was an offence at the time of the alleged acts, and the right not to be sentenced to a more severe penalty is protected at sentencing.

  • Retrospective application of statutes
  • Money laundering
  • Right to fair trial
  • Statutory interpretation
Read case analysis
Financial crimes [2024] MWHCFin 2

Financial Intelligence Authority v Ali and Another

Financial Intelligence Authority v Ali and Another (Civil Cause 2 of 2024) [2024] MWHCFin 2 (8 April 2024)

The Financial Crimes Division is the only proper forum to determine matters relating to preservation orders under the Financial Crimes Act. The preservation order against the 1st Defendant's account remains valid and enforceable. The 1st Defendant's conduct in seeking relief from the Commercial Division after refusal in the Financial Crimes Division constitutes forum shopping and abuse of process. An interlocutory injunction is necessary to preserve the status quo and prevent dissipation of the funds until the substantive matter is resolved.

  • Preservation orders
  • Jurisdiction of divisions of the high court
  • Forum shopping
  • Interlocutory injunctions
  • Asset freezing
  • Abuse of court process
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] MWHCCiv 3

Kalua and 11 others v Attorney General

Kalua and 11 others v Attorney General (Civil Cause 16 of 2023) [2024] MWHCCiv 3 (25 March 2024)

The claimants failed to prove their employment status, failed to provide evidence of discrimination, did not exhaust internal remedies before the Police Service Commission, and did not comply with statutory notice requirements. Therefore, the application for default judgment was dismissed.

  • Default judgment
  • Police employment
  • Discrimination
  • Jurisdiction
  • Internal remedies
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] MWHCCrim 1

Kamwagha v R

Kamwagha v R (Criminal Appeal 17 of 2021) [2024] MWHCCrim 1 (25 March 2024)

The evidence did not meet the threshold for grievous harm as defined by law, and the prosecution failed to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt. The court, bound by precedent, could not substitute a conviction for a lesser offence not charged. The conviction for malicious damage to property was also not supported by sufficient evidence. Both convictions and sentences were quashed and set aside.

  • Grievous harm
  • Malicious damage to property
  • Unlawful wounding
  • Standard of proof
  • Self-defence
  • Provocation
Read case analysis
Tort [2024] MWHC 22

Banda v Malawi Post Corporation (Personal Injury Cause 138 of 2020)

Banda v Malawi Post Corporation (Personal Injury Cause 138 of 2020) [2024] MWHC 22 (19 March 2024)

The High Court of Malawi dismissed claims for false imprisonment, defamation, malicious prosecution, and conversion of money, but upheld conversion of listed office items.

  • Conversion
  • False imprisonment
  • Defamation
  • Malicious prosecution
  • Loss of property
  • Damages
Read case analysis
Land law [2024] MWHC 20

Kuweruza v Kampaundi

Kuweruza v Kampaundi (Civil Appeal 116 of 2016) [2024] MWHC 20 (18 March 2024)

The lower court erred in holding that customary land cannot be bequeathed by will; however, the purported will was invalid for lack of proper execution. The lower court also erred in finding the land was connected to chieftaincy without proper proof of custom as required by section 64 of the Courts Act. The evidence showed the appellant's father occupied the land prior to becoming chief, and the respondent failed to prove a custom that the land was tied to chieftaincy. The appeal was allowed and the land ordered restored to the appellant and her siblings.

  • Inheritance of customary land
  • Validity of wills
  • Judicial notice of customary law
  • Magistrate court jurisdiction
  • Remedies for property loss
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2024] MWHC 12

Dr Makadia v FMB Capital Holdings Limited PLC

Dr Makadia v FMB Capital Holdings Limited PLC (Commercial Case 27 of 2018) [2024] MWHC 12 (15 March 2024)

The High Court of Malawi assessed and reduced defended costs claims after dismissal and reinstatement, allowing MK21,625,940.25 in total costs.

  • Assessment of costs
  • Taxation of costs
  • Legal practitioner and own client scale
  • Indemnity basis
  • Objections to bill of costs
  • Assessment-of-costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure

Henry Yotamu Munthali v Mzuzu City Council

The High Court held that Mzuzu City Council was not exempt from enforcement under Order 34 rule 4 CPR 2017 and dismissed its application to stay the third-party debt order.

  • Third-party debt order
  • Stay of enforcement
  • Exemption from enforcement
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Government/public officer proceedings
  • Costs
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Malawi decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.