Sign in
Malawi Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Malawi Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Malawi decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Contract law [2025] MWHC 25

GM Plastics Industry Limited v Shamrock Group Of Companies Limited

GM Plastics Industry Limited v Shamrock Group Of Companies Limited (Commercial Cause 327 of 2018) [2025] MWHC 25 (26 November 2025)

The Claimant proved on the balance of probabilities that an agreement existed for compensation in Malawi Kwacha equivalent to US$25,000, and the Defendant breached this agreement by failing to pay. The claim is not illegal as payment is sought in local currency, with US Dollars as a reference. Defendant's failure to call witnesses supports adverse inference against its case.

  • Breach of contract
  • Compensation for currency devaluation
  • Burden of proof
  • Party costs
Read case analysis
Banking law [2024] MWCommC 2

NBS Bank Limited v Kaonga and others

NBS Bank Limited v Kaonga and others (Commercial Case 134 of 2014) [2024] MWCommC 2 (24 February 2024)

There was no cogent evidence of fraud by the defendants; the matter is one of outstanding debt. The 1st and 2nd defendants are liable for the sums claimed plus interest. Claims for attachment of the 3rd defendant’s beneficial interest and for general and exemplary damages fail. Order for delivery of vehicles is granted if recovery is possible.

  • Loan default
  • Security for loans
  • Fraud allegations
  • Breach of contract
  • Damages
  • Attachment of property
Read case analysis
Commercial law [2023] MWHC 49

Waterfalls International Holdings Limited v Chikola t/a Chikola Investments

Waterfalls International Holdings Limited v Chikola t/a Chikola Investments (Commercial Cause 144 of 2023) [2023] MWHC 49 (5 December 2023)

The High Court of Malawi dismissed the defendant’s application for summary judgment on a counterclaim for payment for fertiliser, finding triable issues over title and the alleged theft.

  • Summary judgment
  • Breach of contract
  • Title to goods
  • Counterclaim
  • Summary-judgment
  • Title-to-goods
Read case analysis
Contract law [2023] MWHC 101

Sangala v Sabadia (Land Cause 65 of 2018)

Sangala v Sabadia (Land Cause 65 of 2018) [2023] MWHC 101 (23 June 2023)

On assessment of damages after summary judgment, the High Court awarded the claimant MWK 40 million for plot LK 1173, MWK 10 million general damages, and costs.

  • Breach of contract
  • Specific performance
  • Damages assessment
  • Breach-of-contract
  • Damages-assessment
  • Land-dispute
Read case analysis
Banking law [2023] MWCommC 2

Londiwa t/a Kaizwanga Investment and General Dealers v Standard Bank plc

Londiwa t/a Kaizwanga Investment and General Dealers v Standard Bank plc (Commercial Cause 32 of 2022) [2023] MWCommC 2 (20 April 2023)

The claimant's action is frivolous and vexatious as the bank complied with all statutory requirements, acted in good faith, and the claimant suppressed material facts. The law does not support the remedies sought by the claimant, and any loss suffered is remediable only by damages, not injunction. The injunction was improperly obtained and must be vacated; the action is dismissed with costs to the defendant.

  • Injunctions
  • Power of sale
  • Breach of contract
  • Frivolous and vexatious proceedings
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2022] MWSC 23

Mota Engil Engenharia E Construcao (MW) v Omega security Solutions (Pvt) Limited

Mota Engil Engenharia E Construcao (MW) v Omega security Solutions (Pvt) Limited (Civil Appeal 159 of 2013) [2022] MWSC 23 (20 December 2022)

The grounds of appeal did not comply with Order III, rule 2 of the Supreme Court of Appeal Rules, being argumentative, imprecise, ambiguous, and failing to specify whether based on law or fact. There were no interests of justice warranting waiver of non-compliance. Consequently, there was no competent appeal before the Court, and the appeal was dismissed for want of due prosecution.

  • Appeal grounds
  • Procedural compliance
  • Breach of contract
  • Damages
  • Interest
  • Dismissal for want of prosecution
Read case analysis
Company law [2022] MWSC 24

Patel and 3 others v Press corporation Limited & 1 other

Patel and 3 others v Press corporation Limited & 1 other (Civil Appeal 3072 of 2003) [2022] MWSC 24 (14 December 2022)

The Supreme Court of Appeal addressed a long-running joint venture dispute, upheld minority shareholder protection, dismissed the cross-appeal, and restored the original shareholding ratio.

  • Minority shareholder protection
  • Joint venture agreements
  • Breach of contract
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Corporate management
  • Liquidation
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2022] MWSC 25

RMT Initiative Limited t/a C-Track v Electricity Supply Commision of Malawi (MSCA Civil Appeal 52 of 2019)

RMT Initiative Limited t/a C-Track v Electricity Supply Commision of Malawi (MSCA Civil Appeal 52 of 2019) [2022] MWSC 25 (6 October 2022)

The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against refusal to restore a claim dismissed for non-attendance at mediation, finding no abuse of discretion.

  • Breach of contract
  • Restoration of dismissed suit
  • Judicial discretion
  • Mediation procedure
  • Civil-procedure
  • Judicial-discretion
Read case analysis
Contract law [2022] MWHC 64

Mangame v Lujeri Tea Estates Limited

Mangame v Lujeri Tea Estates Limited (Civil Cause 352 of 2017) [2022] MWHC 64 (20 May 2022)

The High Court of Malawi dismissed a tea grower’s claims for breach of contract, damages, and defamation after finding no proven written contract and no actionable defamation.

  • Breach of contract
  • Defamation
  • Damages
  • Proof of contract
  • Proof of loss
  • Breach-of-contract
Read case analysis
Banking law [2022] MWSC 4

Brymsons Limited v National Bank of Malawi Limited

Brymsons Limited v National Bank of Malawi Limited (Commercial Case 42 of 2013; MSCA Civil Appeal 77 of 2015) [2022] MWSC 4 (31 March 2022)

The appellant's own practices in handling cheque books, failure to audit accounts, and failure to check bank statements facilitated the fraud. The bank exercised reasonable care and skill as required by law, and the signatures were so similar that detection by ordinary means was not possible. The appellant is precluded from setting up the forgery or want of authority. The appeal is dismissed with costs.

  • Banker-customer relationship
  • Duty of care
  • Forged cheques
  • Breach of contract
  • Estoppel
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Malawi decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.