Sign in
Malawi Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Malawi Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Malawi decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law [2025] MWHCCiv 1

S (On The Application of Mr. Godfrey Itaye & 15 Others) v Office of Ombudsman & MACRA

S (On The Application of Mr. Godfrey Itaye & 15 Others) v Office of Ombudsman & MACRA (Judicial Review Cause 23 of 2021) [2025] MWHCCiv 1 (31 January 2025)

The High Court set aside the Ombudsman’s report against MACRA, holding it lacked jurisdiction over an anonymous complaint and its directives were a nullity.

  • Jurisdiction of ombudsman
  • Judicial review
  • Employment contracts
  • Maladministration
  • Transparency and accountability
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] MWHC 1

Gestetner LTD v Mhango, Silungwe & Gondwe

Gestetner LTD v Mhango, Silungwe & Gondwe (Commercial Cause 66 of 2020) [2024] MWHC 1 (22 January 2024)

The High Court Commercial Division held that a dispute over a restraint of trade clause in employment contracts belonged in the Industrial Relations Court, and dismissed the case for want of jurisdiction.

  • Jurisdiction
  • Restraint of trade
  • Employment contracts
  • Labour disputes
  • Employment-contracts
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] MWHC 16

Gestetner Limited v Mhango

Gestetner Limited v Mhango (Commercial Cause 66 of 2020) [2024] MWHC 16 (22 January 2024)

The dispute arises from an employment contract and concerns obligations and restrictions related to employment, not a commercial or business arrangement; therefore, the Industrial Relations Court has exclusive jurisdiction, and the High Court, Commercial Division, lacks jurisdiction.

  • Jurisdiction
  • Restraint of trade
  • Employment contracts
Read case analysis
Employment law [2022] MWHC 214

Mhango & 29 Others v Columbia Commonwealth University (IRC MATTER 899 of 2020)

Mhango & 29 Others v Columbia Commonwealth University (IRC MATTER 899 of 2020) [2022] MWHC 214 (25 July 2022)

The court assessed 18 months of unpaid salary arrears for 30 employees after default judgment, accepted their calculations, and added a 25% uplift.

  • Salary arrears
  • Compensation assessment
  • Default judgment
  • Employment contracts
  • Salary-arrears
  • Default-judgment
Read case analysis
Labour law [2019] MWIRC 11

Moyo v Registered Trustees of Lake Malawi Diocese of Anglican Church (IRC MATTER 16 of 2016)

Moyo v Registered Trustees of Lake Malawi Diocese of Anglican Church (IRC MATTER 16 of 2016) [2019] MWIRC 11 (28 March 2019)

The court found that the October 2012 Terms and Conditions of Service were the applicable regulations, not a draft, and that the applicant's placement on unpaid study leave after two years violated her contract and constituted unfair labour practice. The applicant was entitled to withheld salary, annual increments, and leave from August 2015 to date. However, her eviction from institutional housing was not unfair as she was notified and the housing policy gave discretion to the respondent. Salary resumption is only upon her return to work.

  • Study leave
  • Unfair labour practices
  • Employment contracts
  • Salary arrears
  • Eviction from institutional housing
Read case analysis
Employment law [2017] MWSC 23

Namasasu v Msungama and Another

Namasasu v Msungama and Another (Civil Appeal 8 of 2016) [2017] MWSC 23 (6 March 2017)

The applicant failed to establish a good arguable claim for an interlocutory injunction as the dispute is a private law employment matter, not suitable for judicial review, and damages would be an adequate remedy. The disciplinary process was not vitiated by bias due to the doctrine of necessity.

  • Interlocutory injunctions
  • Wrongful dismissal
  • Judicial review
  • Doctrine of necessity
  • Employment contracts
Read case analysis
Labour law [2015] MWHC 494

S v Council, University of Malawi|Ex Parte: University of Malawi Workers Trade Union (Misc. Civil Cause 1 of 2015)

S v Council, University of Malawi|Ex Parte: University of Malawi Workers Trade Union (Misc. Civil Cause 1 of 2015) [2015] MWHC 494 (27 July 2015)

The Respondent acted ultra vires by declaring the strike illegal and imposing pecuniary penalties, as only the Industrial Relations Court or High Court has such power. All consequential actions, including withholding pay and declaring absence, were invalid. The Respondent's actions were unreasonable, illegal, and violated principles of natural justice.

  • Right to strike
  • Ultra vires
  • Natural justice
  • Judicial review
  • Employment contracts
  • Deduction of wages
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2015] MWHC 493

S v Council, University of Malawi|Ex Parte: University of Malawi Workers Trade Union (Misc. Civil Cause 1 of 2015)

S v Council, University of Malawi|Ex Parte: University of Malawi Workers Trade Union (Misc. Civil Cause 1 of 2015) [2015] MWHC 493 (2 March 2015)

The High Court dismissed an application to discharge leave for judicial review, finding the dispute raised public law issues about the legality of a strike and power to declare it illegal.

Read case analysis
Employment law [2009] MWSC 6

Wawanya v Malawi Housing Corporation (40 of 2007)

Wawanya v Malawi Housing Corporation (40 of 2007) [2009] MWSC 6 (9 September 2009)

The Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed an employee’s appeal against a three-month compensation award after unfair dismissal, holding the High Court could determine remedies.

  • Unfair dismissal
  • Employment contracts
  • Remedies for wrongful termination
  • Unfair-dismissal
  • Employment-remedies
  • Fixed-term-employment
Read case analysis
Labour law [2001] MWHC 107

Malawi Telecommunication LTD v Malawi Posts and Telecommunications Workers Union

Malawi Telecommunication LTD v Malawi Posts and Telecommunications Workers Union (Civil Cause 2721 of 2001) [2001] MWHC 107 (16 October 2001)

The High Court retains unlimited original jurisdiction over civil matters, including labour and employment disputes, unless expressly ousted by statute. The Industrial Relations Court's jurisdiction is not exclusive, and the High Court cannot dismiss an action merely because the Industrial Relations Court also has jurisdiction. The employer's claim for injunction and breach of contract is properly before the High Court, as the Industrial Relations Court does not have jurisdiction over torts or employer claims for breach of contract.

  • Jurisdiction
  • Industrial relations court
  • High court powers
  • Injunctions
  • Labour disputes
  • Employment contracts
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Malawi decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.