Namasasu v Msungama and Another
Namasasu v Msungama and Another (Civil Appeal 8 of 2016) [2017] MWSC 23 (6 March 2017)
The applicant failed to establish a good arguable claim for an interlocutory injunction as the dispute is a private law employment matter, not suitable for judicial review, and damages would be an adequate remedy. The disciplinary process was not vitiated by bias due to the doctrine of necessity.
Source excerpt
- Interlocutory injunctions
- Wrongful dismissal
- Judicial review
- Doctrine of necessity
- Employment contracts