16 Mar 2021
Abd Ghani Golamdin 1. ) UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA 2. ) UNIUTAMA MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS SDN BHD (dahulunya dikenali sebagai Uniutama Management Sdn Bhd) 3. ) UNIUTAMA SOLUTION SDN BHD (dahulunya dikenali sebagai R & D Serindit Com UUM Sdn Bhd)
- Citation
- 01(f)-18-07/2020(K) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Court
- f
- Case number
- 01(f)-18-07/2020(K) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to prove the existence, authenticity and contents of exhibit P22 or that the second and third respondents authorised or approved it; absence of board resolutions and contemporaneous approvals, together with conduct of witnesses, rendered P22 an afterthought with no probative value; the Turquand rule did not apply as the appellant was an insider; admissibility under Evidence Act did not bar challenge to existence; therefore the High Court's factual findings were not perverse and dismissal was affirmed.