Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Conclusive statement of account

Legal area

Court

17 Dec 2020

NORDIN BIN SIDIN [BERNIAGA ATAS NAMA DAN GAYA ARNAB PELANGI ENTERPRISE (JM0611457-T)] 1. MOHAMED KHALED BIN NORDIN 2. KERAJAAN NEGERI JOHOR 3. PUJB RETAIL SDN BHD [NO. SYARIKAT : 1102748-H] 4. MAJLIS AMANAH RAKYAT

Citation

JA-21NCvC-15-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

JA-21NCvC-15-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The application to strike out succeeded because the pleadings disclosed no reasonable cause of action: MARA owed no duty beyond the financing terms, disbursement complied with the facility documentation, the plaintiff had signed and acted upon the documents and failed to demonstrate manifest error in the accounts, and the plaintiff's conduct estopped him from disputing the claim; the claim was obviously unsustainable and struck out.
17 Dec 2020

ROZILA BINTI LONG [BERNIAGA ATAS NAMA DAN GAYA LADUNI SARI RESOURCES (JM002360188-T)] 1. MOHAMED KHALED BIN NORDIN 2. KERAJAAN NEGERI JOHOR 3. PUJB RETAIL SDN BHD [NO. SYARIKAT : 1102748-H] 4. MAJLIS AMANAH RAKYAT

Citation

JA-21NCvC-12-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

JA-21NCvC-12-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The Fourth Defendant owed no duty to conduct feasibility studies or to advise; the disbursement complied with the Facility terms; the Plaintiff executed the financing documents, accepted and partly repaid the Facility, and failed to show manifest error or misrepresentation; his conduct estopped him from disputing the account; accordingly the claim against the Fourth Defendant disclosed no reasonable cause of action and was struck out under Order 18 r.19.
17 Dec 2020

MOHD HAFIS BIN JOHAN [BERNIAGA ATAS NAMA DAN GAYA THE AYDENS (JM0750428-U)] 1. MOHAMED KHALED BIN NORDIN 2. KERAJAAN NEGERI JOHOR 3. PUJB RETAIL SDN BHD [NO. SYARIKAT : 1102748-H] 4. MAJLIS AMANAH RAKYAT

Citation

JA-21NCvC-17-05/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

JA-21NCvC-17-05/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

On the evidence and documents before the Court the Plaintiff's claim against the Fourth Defendant was plainly unsustainable: the Fourth Defendant merely provided financing in accordance with the Facility terms, disbursement complied with those terms, the Plaintiff signed the relevant documents and failed to show manifest error or misrepresentation, and his conduct (including silence) estopped him from disputing the account; accordingly the Statement of Claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action and was struck out.

Malaysia Case Law

NORDIN BIN SIDIN [BERNIAGA ATAS NAMA DAN GAYA ARNAB PELANGI ENTERPRISE (JM0611457-T)] 1. MOHAMED KHALED BIN NORDIN 2. KERAJAAN NEGERI JOHOR 3. PUJB RETAIL SDN BHD [NO. SYARIKAT : 1102748-H] 4. MAJLIS AMANAH RAKYAT

ROZILA BINTI LONG [BERNIAGA ATAS NAMA DAN GAYA LADUNI SARI RESOURCES (JM002360188-T)] 1. MOHAMED KHALED BIN NORDIN 2. KERAJAAN NEGERI JOHOR 3. PUJB RETAIL SDN BHD [NO. SYARIKAT : 1102748-H] 4. MAJLIS AMANAH RAKYAT

MOHD HAFIS BIN JOHAN [BERNIAGA ATAS NAMA DAN GAYA THE AYDENS (JM0750428-U)] 1. MOHAMED KHALED BIN NORDIN 2. KERAJAAN NEGERI JOHOR 3. PUJB RETAIL SDN BHD [NO. SYARIKAT : 1102748-H] 4. MAJLIS AMANAH RAKYAT