Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Possession and eviction

Legal area

Court

28 Feb 2025

KL CITY GATEWAY SDN. BHD. (Dikenali sebelum ini sebagaRITZY GLOSS SDN BHD 1. ) Md Shafie Bin Dikir 2. ) Rohani Binti Dikir 3. ) Ghazali Bin Dikir 4. ) Sharil Bin Dikir 5. ) Muhamad Iskandar Bin Dikir 6. ) Kl City Gateway Sdn. Bhd. (Dikenali

Citation

WA-24NCvC-2539-07/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-24NCvC-2539-07/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

A registered proprietor who holds indefeasible title following completion of land acquisition and subsequent alienation may invoke Order 89 to obtain possession from occupiers who remain without the proprietor's licence or consent; where acquisition steps (Form H, Form K, issuance of new titles) are completed and no triable issue is raised, summary judgment for possession is appropriate.
13 Jul 2023

1. ) XXXX 2. ) KESEMUA ORANG YANG TIDAK DIKENALI YANG MENDUDUKI PREMIS NO. 21 JALAN TAMAN THEAN TEIK DUA, 11500 AYER ITAM, PULAU PINANG XXXX

Citation

P-04(NCvC)(W)-307-07/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Court

NCvC
Case number

P-04(NCvC)(W)-307-07/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)

The agreement is a licence because its unambiguous language repeatedly and expressly grants only a licence and disclaims any legal interest; alternatively an alleged lease would fail because no fixed term was specified and the purported lease was not registered as required by the National Land Code (s221(3)), therefore the licence could be validly terminated and the plaintiffs entitled to vacant possession subject to ordered compensation for buildings.
12 Jan 2022

GROUP SEVEN SDN BHD (COMPANY NO. 1389127-U) LAMAN PESONA SDN BHD (COMPANY NO. 929873-U)

Citation

CB-22NCVC-11-07/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

CB-22NCVC-11-07/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Plaintiff waived objection to the Defendant's affidavit by filing a reply; on the affidavits and pleadings there was no evidence of a contractual relationship because Group Seven was incorporated after the alleged agreement and Mr Ivan lacked authority to bind it, rendering the claim plainly unsustainable under O.18 r.19; accordingly the Defendant's strike out application is allowed and the interlocutory injunction is dismissed.
16 Jan 2020

Pelaburan MARA Bhd Hisharta Sdn Bhd

Citation

BA-A52-85-07/2019 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Court

Sessions Court
Case number

BA-A52-85-07/2019 (Mahkamah Sesyen)

The court held that Order 32 r.13(2)(b)'s 14-day filing requirement is mandatory and applies to Order 14 proceedings; the defendant filed the affidavit outside the mandatory period without making a prior application for extension under Order 3 r.5 and the court therefore had no discretion to admit the late affidavit; consequently the affidavit in reply was not allowed and the plaintiff's Order 14 application proceeded on the plaintiff's supporting affidavit alone.

Malaysia Case Law

KL CITY GATEWAY SDN. BHD. (Dikenali sebelum ini sebagaRITZY GLOSS SDN BHD 1. ) Md Shafie Bin Dikir 2. ) Rohani Binti Dikir 3. ) Ghazali Bin Dikir 4. ) Sharil Bin Dikir 5. ) Muhamad Iskandar Bin Dikir 6. ) Kl City Gateway Sdn. Bhd. (Dikenali

1. ) XXXX 2. ) KESEMUA ORANG YANG TIDAK DIKENALI YANG MENDUDUKI PREMIS NO. 21 JALAN TAMAN THEAN TEIK DUA, 11500 AYER ITAM, PULAU PINANG XXXX

GROUP SEVEN SDN BHD (COMPANY NO. 1389127-U) LAMAN PESONA SDN BHD (COMPANY NO. 929873-U)

Pelaburan MARA Bhd Hisharta Sdn Bhd