22 Dec 2025
No final judgment or dispositive reasoning is contained in the provided text; ratio decidendi not available from the document.
23 May 2023
High Court held that procedural requirements under Article 135(2) and the relevant regulations were satisfied by written representations, no inquiry or oral hearing was necessary, the evidence supported a finding that the applicant lied during a recorded investigation, dismissal was within the disciplinary authority's legitimate discretion and not disproportionate, and there was no obligation to separately communicate reasons; therefore the judicial review application was dismissed.
15 Feb 2023
The decision was set aside because the Land Administrator failed to serve the mandatory Form 2A notice on the registered proprietor (Perayu 1), thereby denying the proprietor the opportunity to be heard as required by Section 27 NLC; additionally the decision shows failure to properly consider the applicants' alternative route proposals and the requirement to connect to a public terminal, rendering the exercise of discretion under Sections 388–390 NLC unlawful and procedurally unfair.