28 Oct 2025
SKS Credit Sdn Bhd 1. ) Chin Lin Sheng 2. ) LOW KHIM JOO
- Citation
- JA-12BNCvC-11-07/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- JA-12BNCvC-11-07/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The appeal was allowed because the Sessions Court was wrong to infer an implied undertaking where the defendant had expressly refused any undertaking and the payer acted with full knowledge; the Prohibitory Order had lapsed under section 338(5) NLC and did not impose a duty on the chargee to procure its removal; written authority showed the solicitor acted for the Chargor; accordingly there was no contractual or restitutionary basis to require refund and the Sessions Court's judgment was set aside.