11 Mar 2025
TEO YUN HOCK 1. ) AUTOHOME MOTOR SDN BHD 2. ) GO AUTO SALES SDN BHD 3. ) SHEIKH MOHAMAD AZLI BIN SHEIKH MOHAMAD NASIMUDDIN KAMAL 4. ) SHEIKH MOHAMAD AZRUL BIN SHEIKH MOHAMAD NASIMUDDIN KAMAL 5. ) AHMAD AZAM BIN SULAIMAN 6. ) GO AUTO SERVICE
- Citation
- WA-22NCC-70-02/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-22NCC-70-02/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
On the evidence (agreements, payments, WhatsApp admissions, registration of charges and conduct of defendants) the plaintiff demonstrated a good arguable case against D3 and D14, showed that the defendants have assets within Malaysia and that there is a real risk of dissipation given lack of probity and alleged use of related entities to siphon funds; accordingly a Mareva injunction was justified and granted in part against defendants 1–4, 6 and 14 to preserve assets up to RM3,532,000.