14 Oct 2024
1. ) YEO TECK WAH 2. ) CHIEW CHIN FAH 3. ) E KIM LAM 4. ) HEN KAI YANG 5. ) EE SIAU LI
- Citation
- MC-83-270-06/2023 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Case number
- MC-83-270-06/2023 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Prosecution failed to prove the seized monies were used or intended for gambling; photographic and witness evidence did not establish a nexus between the seized sums and the gambling offence, reconstruction of the scene was prejudicial, and alternative innocent inferences (salaries/celebration funds) were at least as probable; therefore forfeiture was not justified and the monies must be returned to the respective accused.