28 Sept 2021
1. ) AMINNUDIN REZAL BIN JAAFAR 2. ) HYE YOUNG AHN 3. ) BRUNO LOUIS SIMON VANHOUCKE 4. ) MARGARET MOSES VANHOUCKE 5. ) CHAN LAI WAN 6. ) CHIEN CHOW LIANG 7. ) TEE FOONG KEONG NICHOLAS 8. ) SEW CHAW ENG @ SIEW CHOON ENG 9. ) CINDY TEE SIN YE
- Citation
- WA-22NCVC-464-08/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-22NCVC-464-08/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The Schedule H statutory completion period of 36 months cannot be validly varied to 54 months by reference to an EOT granted under an ultra vires regulation; therefore clauses in the SPA purporting to extend completion to 54 months are invalid, plaintiffs are entitled to statutory LAD computed from the prescribed period (and from booking fee where applicable), the EOT may be disregarded without judicial review, and there were no triable issues to defeat summary judgment.