Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Vexatious litigant order

Legal area

Court

16 Oct 2025

Kok Kon Sang 1. ) LEE TZE JUIN/MESSRS. ZARINA LOH & WONG 2. ) LIM CHEW LIANG 3. ) PENTADBIR TANAH & GALIAN/ ATAU MOHD. NASRUL BIN MOHD. NAWI

Citation

WA-25-273-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-25-273-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The application was struck out because the applicant, having been validly declared a vexatious litigant by earlier Order and Gazette Notification, had not obtained the requisite leave before filing the judicial review; additionally he failed to comply with court directions to serve the AGC and failed to provide intelligible medical evidence to justify his absence, thereby justifying disposition of the leave application in his absence and striking out the application.
31 Jul 2025

1. ) Puncak Haruman Sdn Bhd 2. ) Elit Binaraya Sdn Bhd 3. ) Mohd Rashid Bin Mohd Ali 1. ) JW Development Sdn Bhd 2. ) Syarikat Bamas Enterprise Sdn Bhd 3. ) Lee Kah Koon 4. ) Abdul Wahab Bin Abdullah 5. ) Zulkarnain bin Omar

Citation

BA-22NCvC-138-03/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

BA-22NCvC-138-03/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The court dismissed the preliminary objection and held that applications for stay of execution and appeals are procedural steps in the original proceedings and do not necessarily amount to initiation of new proceedings requiring leave under the vexatious litigant order; exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Order 92 r 4 ROC 2012 and having found special circumstances (interlocutory strike-out rather than full trial and the undeveloped status of the land), the court granted the stay of execution pending appeal and ordered costs payable by the plaintiffs to the 1st defendant.
29 Apr 2025

CIMB BANK BERHAD KOK KON SANG

Citation

WA-24NCvC-1212-03/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-24NCvC-1212-03/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The court found the Vexatious Litigant Order valid and enforceable, that service was properly effected, that documentary evidence established 14 wilful breaches beyond reasonable doubt with no defence or attempt to purge contempt, and therefore committed the contemnor to 24 days' imprisonment and ordered specified monetary compensation and costs to vindicate judicial authority and deter repetition.

Malaysia Case Law

Kok Kon Sang 1. ) LEE TZE JUIN/MESSRS. ZARINA LOH & WONG 2. ) LIM CHEW LIANG 3. ) PENTADBIR TANAH & GALIAN/ ATAU MOHD. NASRUL BIN MOHD. NAWI

1. ) Puncak Haruman Sdn Bhd 2. ) Elit Binaraya Sdn Bhd 3. ) Mohd Rashid Bin Mohd Ali 1. ) JW Development Sdn Bhd 2. ) Syarikat Bamas Enterprise Sdn Bhd 3. ) Lee Kah Koon 4. ) Abdul Wahab Bin Abdullah 5. ) Zulkarnain bin Omar

CIMB BANK BERHAD KOK KON SANG