7 Apr 2022
VIGNESH NAIDU A/L KUPPUSAMY NAIDU PREMA BONANZA SDN BHD
- Citation
- W-02(IM)(NCvC)-880-04/2021 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Court
- IM
- Case number
- W-02(IM)(NCvC)-880-04/2021 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
The Court held that regulation 11(3) is ultra vires (per Ang Ming Lee) so any extension under it and any amendment of the statutory Schedule H completion period to 54 months is void; estoppel cannot validate an ultra vires amendment; the appellant's cause of action for LAD accrued upon taking vacant possession (February 2017) and the claim filed in August 2020 is within the six-year limitation; writ proceedings were appropriate and Ang Ming Lee applies retrospectively absent a contrary pronouncement by the Federal Court.