24 Apr 2024
RUSNA BINTI KASSIM 1. ) NASRON BIN ISKANDAR 2. ) SURIANA BINTI NASRON 3. ) SUZILAWATI ANA BINTI NASRON 4. ) SUZLINA BINTI NASRON 5. ) SUZLITA BINTI NASRON
- Citation
- BA-22NCvC-496-12/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-22NCvC-496-12/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The High Court refused to strike out the Plaintiff's writ and statement of claim because material factual disputes (including the existence, use and boundaries of the 940 sq ft subject land and the alleged transfer/refusal) required resolution at a full trial with oral witnesses; strike‑out was therefore inappropriate. Separately, by reason of the statutory amendment to subsection 68(1) Court of Judicature Act 1964 and the Order 18 r.19 amendment which came into force on 1 October 2022 (P.U.(B)451/2022), an appeal against the strike‑out decision in this case is unappealable as a matter of law.