Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Namibia decisions
Decisions matching the current search
S v Amib (CR 103 of 2022) [2022] NAHCMD 647 (29 November 2022)
The High Court set aside a conviction and sentence after finding that the magistrate failed to properly question the accused under section 112(1)(b) and risked duplication of convictions.
S v Patrick (CR 58 of 2022) [2022] NAHCMD 342 (1 July 2022)
High Court review setting aside an attempted murder conviction and substituting assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm, with remittal for fresh sentencing.
Gawiseb v S (CA 54 of 2016) [2022] NAHCMD 231 (10 May 2022)
The High Court upheld rape and assault convictions, but ordered part of the sentences to run concurrently to reduce the cumulative effect of 60 years.
S v Gemeng and Another (CC 20 of 2016) [2022] NAHCMD 145 (29 March 2022)
High Court judgment on rape charges based on circumstantial and DNA evidence, with convictions on two counts and acquittals on related assault and complicity counts.
S v Mutuka (CC 2 of 2021) [2022] NAHCNLD 25 (28 March 2022)
Sentencing decision for assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm against a toddler in a domestic context; five years' imprisonment, two suspended.
Ameb v S (CR 12 of 2022) [2022] NAHCMD 129 (23 March 2022)
On review, the High Court confirmed the convictions, but set aside count 1’s sentence because direct imprisonment was incompetent under the Criminal Procedure Act.
Joseph v S (HC-NLD-CRI-APP-CAL 56 of 2020) [2021] NAHCNLD 48 (26 May 2021)
The High Court altered a domestic-violence conviction on appeal, found no proven domestic relationship, and substituted a partially suspended prison sentence.
S v Ixulu (CRIMINAL 33 of 2021) [2021] NAHCMD 216 (10 May 2021)
High Court review in a criminal matter set aside the conviction and sentence on count one for inadequate section 112 questioning, and confirmed count two.
S v Kandjimi and S v Karupeteka (CRIMINAL 28 of 2021) [2021] NAHCNLD 184 (23 April 2021)
The High Court confirmed two convictions but reduced and suspended the sentences, finding the magistrate had overemphasized offence seriousness over the accuseds’ personal circumstances.
S v Sipahu (CRIMINAL 26 of 2021) [2021] NAHCMD 163 (16 April 2021)
The conviction and sentence were not in accordance with justice because the accused's state of intoxication raised doubt as to his capacity, and the magistrate failed to follow the correct procedure by not entering a plea of not guilty under s 113 of the CPA. The sentence was also disproportionate.
Source excerpt
Explore more
