2 Jun 2006
Carr v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2006] NZACC 139
- Court
- District Court
On the balance of probabilities the medical evidence established that the identified disc protrusions (notably L2/3) were more probably than not caused by the May 1996 incident and remain a cause of substance of the appellant’s ongoing incapacity; therefore s26(4) exclusion did not apply and ACC’s suspension of entitlements was unlawful and was quashed.