18 Feb 2015
Hedo v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2015] NZACC 34
- Court
- District Court
No question of law existed for a bona fide appeal because the judge correctly found on the evidence that the alleged harms were chipping of crowns and bleeding gums attributable to natural use or normal function and thus not a personal physical injury covered by the Act (s26 and s26(4)); there was no pleaded or evidenced claim of mental injury before the judge, so Monk was not applicable; leave to appeal is refused.