17 Sept 2015
JIN v KNOX PROPERTY INVESTMENT LTD [2015] NZHC 2296
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 2296
- Court
- High Court
Applicant failed to establish a reasonably arguable equitable interest in the property: the $50,000 was paid for W&L and at most gives rise to a creditor or accounting claim against W&L; the change to a different corporate purchaser in which the applicant had no part and the inability to attribute Lin Luo's knowledge to the respondent meant no proprietary interest in the respondent's registered title; therefore the caveat could not be sustained.