15 Apr 2016
ARCHITECTURE AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT LTD v WINDOWMAKERS LTD [2016] NZHC 700
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 700
- Court
- High Court
Disclosure of the plaintiff's funding arrangement was not ordered because no basis for disclosure was shown and the defendants had the opportunity to seek such disclosure earlier; leave to appeal was dismissed because the proposed second appeal did not raise a question of law or fact of sufficient importance under the Waller v Hider test as applied by Payne v Attorney-General and would not justify the cost and delay; costs for the review hearing were awarded to Mr Brown in the amount of $5,100.