27 Feb 2013
The appeal was dismissed because the material showed prolonged inactivity by the appellant, inability to contact her (returned mail marked 'overseas'), and no confirmed intention to continue or withdraw the appeal, constituting failure to prosecute with due diligence sufficient to justify dismissal under r 14.24 of the District Courts Rules 2009.
24 Apr 2012
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to file submissions and the material before the Court disclosed no merit in the proposed appeal; remittal was unwarranted.
31 Aug 2010
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to take any steps to prosecute the appeal after counsel withdrew and ignored multiple registrar directions and reminders, justifying dismissal for non-prosecution.
4 May 2006
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to prosecute the appeal with due diligence resulting in inordinate and inexcusable delay, such delay caused serious prejudice to the Tribunal and complainant (including the need to re-open evidence years after events), and the overall interests of justice favored dismissal under the Court's discretion pursuant to the High Court Rules.