4 May 2006
NEVILLE JAMES GIBSON V DENTISTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL CA CA41/05
- Citation
- openlaw-903623bd_5713_4aed_bd57_05d729dfbdb9.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to prosecute the appeal with due diligence resulting in inordinate and inexcusable delay, such delay caused serious prejudice to the Tribunal and complainant (including the need to re-open evidence years after events), and the overall interests of justice favored dismissal under the Court's discretion pursuant to the High Court Rules.