8 Dec 2008
DANIEL THOMAS SPENCER RIDDIFORD AND YVONNE ADA RIDDIFORD AND ANOR V THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL CA CA632/2008
- Citation
- openlaw-f40221f8_e314_45da_a798_6de8752bdc2f.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court refused special leave to appeal the interlocutory decision of MacKenzie J because the LVPA appeals are governed by the same discretion to admit further evidence as other appeals (applying the r716 test), the applicants failed to justify admission of the proposed further evidence or explain the delay, and post-valuation events could not inform the valuation as at the relevant date; the Court also declined to consider special leave on the substantive High Court judgment because the High Court leave application remains undetermined.