28 Jul 2010
JONES V L & Y HOLDINGS (HOLDING) LIMITED HC AK CIV 2010-404-001667
- Citation
- openlaw-433c41d8_d855_4dcc_b315_c844f11f3e0d.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Summary judgment was dismissed because the court was not satisfied as a matter of construction that the absence of a column was an essential term of the contract; there were material evidential conflicts (architects' opinions, valuers' assessments, and factual background) which meant there was a real question to be tried and the matter must proceed to trial.