19 Dec 2011
The judgment is corrected by deleting paragraph (c); the plaintiff is entitled to interest as set out in paragraph (b); no separate order for interest from the date of entry of judgment will be made because rule 11.27 of the High Court Rules governs that matter.
21 Jun 2010
The application to excise the non-party's name and impose a permanent prohibition was dismissed because the strong presumption of open justice was not rebutted by sufficiently compelling or exceptional evidence of harm; the judgment contained no findings against the non-party, allegations remained untested, and reputational risk alone did not justify permanent suppression; the interim order was set to lapse seven days after delivery.
12 May 2010
The Court recalled its 26 April 2010 judgment and corrected it: the additional PricewaterhouseCoopers fee in [34](e)(i) is replaced with $19,282.61 to reflect correct GST treatment; the typographical date is corrected to 27 January 2009; Mr Harper is ordered to pay 75% of the costs of the non-party costs hearing; and the 60% and 75% allocations apply equally to scale costs and relevant disbursements. These corrections are made pursuant to the High Court Rules and the Court will issue a corrected judgment.
5 Oct 2007
The court recalled and amended the earlier judgment to correct a calculation error, awarding the plaintiff $127,696; the plaintiff was entitled to interest on $109,774 from 27 May 2007 to 23 July 2007 at 6.5% and to interest on $17,922 from 21 June 2005 at 6%.