13 Nov 2015
Special leave was dismissed because the review had been set down within three months so s146 did not apply, and the Court of Appeal had already determined there was no cover for the claimed medical misadventure, which precludes any entitlement to weekly compensation and leaves no reasonable prospect of success on appeal.
18 Aug 2011
The appellant agreed at the 25 October 2006 case conference to waive the 'set by' date to obtain further medical evidence and thus contributed to the delay under s.146(1)(b), so no deemed review decision arose; additionally the District Court lacked jurisdiction to consider the Code complaint in absence of a primary decision and due to s.149(3).
23 Sept 2008
The leave application was filed seven days late and is therefore a nullity; no arguable question of law was identified because the 31 October 2005 hearing satisfied s146 (so no deemed decision), the substantive grievance is moot following a fresh ACC decision on 2 August 2006, and therefore leave to appeal is refused and the appeal dismissed.