6 Dec 2023
WENYUE HE v BANK OF NEW ZEALAND [2023] NZSC 162
- Citation
- [2023] NZSC 162
- Court
- Supreme Court
The Court dismissed leave because service was valid: Mr Yuan had at least ostensible authority to accept the s 119 notice and Bella had been removed from the Companies Register so service on it was not required; on the facts BNZ took reasonable steps under s176 and the applicant could not establish at trial a breach that would defeat summary judgment, so no question of general or public importance or miscarriage of justice justified leave.