8 Dec 2020
RE AYDOGAN [2020] NZHC 3238
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 3238
- Court
- High Court
The court concluded that, on the material, the applicant was entitled to restoration under ss 329(1)(a)(ii) and 329(2)(a)(iii) because the company's directors appeared to have allowed removal from the Register to frustrate the applicant's ERA proceedings; restoration should be ordered subject to appropriate service being effected on the Registrar, the Secretary to the Treasury and the company's directors and a further procedural telephone conference to address service and compliance requirements.