19 Aug 2011
LEVIN AND ANOR V RASTKAR COA CA755/2009
- Citation
- COA CA755/2009
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The recall application was granted because the Court had proceeded on the mistaken impression that no High Court costs order had been made; correction required quashing the High Court costs order (which had resulted from the parties' agreement) and ordering the respondent to repay the $5,920 she had received; the respondent must also pay appellants' costs and disbursements for the recall application.