15 Jul 2022
POLICE v COX [2022] NZHC 1695
- Citation
- [2022] NZHC 1695
- Court
- High Court
Where both s 65 and s 65AC apply the court must make orders under both provisions: s 65(3A)/(4A) replace only the indefinite disqualification element of a s 65 order with an alcohol interlock sentence but do not remove the mandatory requirement under s 65 that the offender attend an assessment centre; the District Court erred by not so ordering for both respondents.