30 Mar 2012
CERAMALUS V THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT HC AK CIV 2011-485-001004
- Citation
- openlaw-b2aea9bd_9476_4490_a123_b7dd54f118f5.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Authority correctly interpreted s 89(1)(a) to require availability, willingness and reasonable job‑seeking beyond incumbent Community Board duties; sufficient evidence supported the finding that the appellant was not available or willing and had not taken reasonable steps, and therefore he was not eligible for an ordinary or hardship unemployment benefit under s 90; appeal dismissed.