12 Aug 2010
TOKLEY V ROBINSON AND ANOR HC HAM CIV-2009-419-136
- Citation
- openlaw-a94e287b_79cb_4d40_8286_a58d2e020679.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Because the proceeds were jointly owned by both defendants the second defendant indisputably had an interest in the monies; the High Court therefore had jurisdiction to make an interim charging order against that interest and the order did not prejudice the first defendant since it only charged the second defendant's interest and any change in entitlement ordered by the Family Court would determine the charged proportion.