8 Feb 2017
KARTSEVA v THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT & IMMIGRATION PROTECTION TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHC 97
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 97
- Court
- High Court
Leave to bring judicial review was refused because the proposed grounds did not raise questions capable of serious argument or requiring High Court determination: the negligence argument had not been put to the Tribunal so could not be said to be a failure to take a relevant consideration, the Tribunal's factual inferences were supported by evidence, the Tribunal did not misapply authorities and it gave adequate reasons; although s 249(6) should be read consistently with BORA, that did not justify granting leave in this case.