14 May 2021
The proposed judicial review proceeding was struck out as an abuse of process under r 5.35B because it constituted an impermissible collateral attack on criminal proceedings and conviction where an appeal is the appropriate remedy; continuation would be unjust to respondents and the claim was hopeless given the conviction.
8 Feb 2017
Leave to bring judicial review was refused because the proposed grounds did not raise questions capable of serious argument or requiring High Court determination: the negligence argument had not been put to the Tribunal so could not be said to be a failure to take a relevant consideration, the Tribunal's factual inferences were supported by evidence, the Tribunal did not misapply authorities and it gave adequate reasons; although s 249(6) should be read consistently with BORA, that did not justify granting leave in this case.
6 Apr 2016
The recall application was dismissed because it was a further attempt to re-litigate and challenge prior judgments and therefore constituted an abuse of process; the Court authorised the Registrar to refuse future applications of the same character.